Sensitivity
High sensitivity reacts to smaller visual changes and usually reports more candidates. Low sensitivity keeps only stronger changes but may miss subtle cuts.
Find likely visual cut points, review scene thumbnails and timestamps, and export a structured scene list for editing, chapters or analysis.
Drop a video here
Maximum file size: 2 GB
No videos have been added yet.
The preview and scene timeline will appear here.
Start
-
End
-
Duration
-
If verified, local files and model inference run in the browser. Model assets may still be downloaded, and URL media still comes from the remote host. Disclose both network paths and any cache behavior instead of using an absolute “offline” claim.
It compares visual information across sampled frames to identify likely cuts or strong transitions. It returns candidate boundaries, not a human-level understanding of the story, topic or meaning of each scene.
The analyzer samples frames and measures visual differences to propose where one shot or scene may end and another begin. A result can include false positives from flashes, camera motion or graphics, and false negatives from gradual transitions. Human review remains necessary.
Editors, archivists, QA engineers, educators, researchers and developers use scene timestamps to navigate long media, build chapters, select thumbnails, prepare rough cuts and test video-analysis workflows.
Choose a local video or a direct URL the browser can access.
Start with medium sensitivity and a realistic minimum scene length.
Run the analysis and wait while frames are sampled and compared.
Review thumbnails, timestamps and change scores; remove false boundaries or add missing ones when the UI supports it.
Export the scene list in a supported structured format, or export clips only when the current media engine implements that capability.
High sensitivity reacts to smaller visual changes and usually reports more candidates. Low sensitivity keeps only stronger changes but may miss subtle cuts.
Prevents rapid changes from creating impractically short scenes. Choose a value based on the content pace, not a universal default.
A detector that checks more frames can localize short events better but takes longer and uses more compute. The UI must reflect the actual sampling implementation.
These are algorithmic signals, not proof of a true editorial scene. Explain how the current model calculates or normalizes them if that information exists in source.
JSON is suitable for applications, CSV for spreadsheets, and Markdown for human-readable review. Export only fields actually available in the result.
A visual detector can identify cuts, fades or strong appearance changes. It does not automatically know that a scene is “an interview,” “a product demo” or “a conclusion” unless a separate verified semantic model performs that task. Keep page claims limited to the implemented analysis.
If verified, local files and model inference run in the browser. Model assets may still be downloaded, and URL media still comes from the remote host. Disclose both network paths and any cache behavior instead of using an absolute “offline” claim.
Lower sensitivity, increase minimum scene length or remove boundaries caused by flashes and graphics.
Increase sensitivity, reduce minimum length or add a boundary manually if the UI supports it.
Sampling and keyframe seeking can shift boundaries. Inspect frames around the reported time before cutting.
Use a shorter range, lower-resolution proxy or less frequent sampling when supported, and close memory-heavy tabs.
It is a point where the visual content changes enough to suggest a new shot or segment, such as a hard cut, fade or major layout change.
Not necessarily. The current page must describe the implemented model. If it only measures visual differences, it detects boundaries without understanding narrative meaning.
Start with Medium. Use High for subtle or fast edits and Low when flashes or motion create too many false candidates.
It suppresses boundaries that would create segments shorter than the selected duration.
They are candidates based on sampling and decoding. Review nearby frames before using them for precise cuts.
Yes. Similar-looking cuts, gradual dissolves, darkness and limited sampling can create false negatives.
Only when the current implementation includes a compatible clip-export pipeline. Timestamp export and media encoding are separate capabilities.
Yes when those options are implemented. The exported schema should document timestamp units, score scale and source duration.
Only claim local inference when source code confirms it. Model files may be fetched, and URL videos are retrieved from their host.
Scene detection finds candidate boundaries; the thumbnail generator extracts frames at chosen times or intervals. They can be used together.
A flash can cause a large frame difference that resembles a cut. Reduce sensitivity or mark that boundary as a false positive.
No. Treat it as an analysis aid and review boundaries, especially before editing, publishing or automated processing.